Peer Review Process

Editorial Assessment

All submitted manuscripts are first reviewed by the editorial office to ensure they fall within the journal’s scope and meet basic formatting and quality requirements. Manuscripts that fail to meet these criteria or contain significant ethical issues may be rejected at this stage.

Subject Review

Eligible manuscripts are assigned to an appropriate editor based on the subject area. The editor conducts a preliminary assessment and decides whether the manuscript should proceed to peer review.

External Evaluation

The manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers assess the originality, methodology, clarity, relevance, and overall contribution of the research.

Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the manuscript may be accepted, accepted with minor revisions, returned for major revisions, or rejected. Authors receive detailed feedback to guide necessary improvements.

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

Author Response

Authors are required to revise their manuscript in response to reviewer comments and submit a revised version along with a response to reviewers. Revised manuscripts may be sent for further evaluation if necessary.

Publication Approval

The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief, based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the revised manuscript.

Production Process

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, formatting, and proofreading before final publication. The article is then published online and made accessible to the academic community.

The peer review process is typically completed within 2–3 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and the extent of revisions required.